Học Writing dựa trên bài mẫu luôn là một trong những phương pháp hiệu quả, giúp bạn trau dồi được nhiều từ vựng và ý tưởng lập luận hay. Bài viết hôm nay PREP.VN sẽ tổng hợp cho bạn các bài mẫu IELTS Writing Task 2 Agree or Disagree band điểm 7.0+, cùng xem ngay nhé!
Mục lục bài viết
I. Giới thiệu về dạng IELTS Writing Task 2 Agree or Disagree
1. Dạng bài Agree or Disagree là gì?
IELTS Writing Task 2 Agree or Disagree là dạng bài yêu cầu bạn phải đưa ra quan điểm cá nhân đồng ý hay không đồng ý sau khi đề đã cung cấp một nhận định hay ý kiến trái chiều nào đó, đồng thời đưa ra những lập luận, lý do, thông tin để giải thích.
2. Dấu hiệu nhận biết
Với dạng Agree or Disagree, đề bài thường có 2 phần: Phần 1 là luận điểm/quan điểm về một vấn đề cụ thể’ Phần 2 là câu hỏi có dạng như sau:
- Do you agree or disagree?
- What is your opinion?
- To what extent or disagree?
3. Cấu trúc viết bài dạng Agree or Disagree
Một bài mẫu IELTS Writing Task 2 Agree or Disagree bao gồm các phần như sau:
3.1. Introduction (Mở bài)
Mục đích của đoạn mở bài là trả lời câu hỏi và thể hiện quan điểm của bạn (đồng ý, không đồng ý hay đồng ý một phần) cho vấn đề nhất định của bài.
Phần thân bài là nơi để bạn trình bày các lập luận của mình kèm theo ví dụ chứng minh. Thông thường một bài mẫu IELTS Writing Task 2 Agree or Disagree bạn chỉ cần triển khai 2 luận điểm ứng với 2 đoạn văn.
- Nếu câu trả lời của bạn đưa ra là đồng ý/không đồng ý, lập luận của bạn phải rõ ràng và đủ hợp lý để người đọc hiểu tại sao bạn lại lựa chọn như vậy.
- Nếu câu trả lời của bạn là đồng ý một phần, bạn phải nêu rõ bạn đồng ý hay không đồng ý ở điểm nào. Mọi lập luận phải có giải thích cụ thể và ví dụ rõ ràng.
Tại phần kết luận của một bài mẫu IELTS Writing Task 2 Agree or Disagree. Bạn cần khẳng định lại quan điểm của mình và giải thích ngắn gọn. Đoạn kết luận thường chỉ khoảng 1-3 câu.
Tham khảo thêm bài viết:
II. Các bài mẫu IELTS Writing Task 2 Agree or Disagree
Hãy cùng tham khảo một số bài mẫu IELTS Writing Task 2 Agree or Disagree band điểm cao sau đây nhé!
1. Bài mẫu IELTS Writing Task 2 Agree or Disagree – Bài số 1
1.1. Đề bài
Many factors motivate people in the workplace. Of these, money is the most important. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
1.2. Bài mẫu
At the workplace, people have various motivations to make them work harder. Some argue that money is the most impactful driver. I respectfully disagree with this opinion for several reasons.
It would, however ,be necessary to examine why money could be an important incentive first. Money is obviously essential for people’s livelihoods, since they cannot afford necessities without it. However, enough money to sustain is not merely satisfactory for many, as they desire more money from work. Extra income will allow them to purchase luxuries and display their status to others. For people who come from a different and less well-off area, money will definitely be on top of their list of priorities. Given the possibilities that earning large amounts of money enables, it is hardly surprising that financial motivation accounts for a large part of what drives people to work hard.
Yet, despite these points, there still exist factors that can motivate people harder than money does, making money possibly not the most important factor. One of them is the social environment at the workplace. Secondly, it’s passion for the job. Finally, and most crucially , it’s belief in the purpose. Take politics for example.
In conclusion, I believe that money is not the most important factor which motivates people at work, since there are factors that are more important.
2. Bài mẫu IELTS Writing Task 2 Agree or Disagree – Bài số 2
2.1. Đề bài
Some people say patriotism is the biggest cause of war. But others believe that when people are patriotic, they are more likely to take an interest in a country’s day-to-today running and therefore less likely to allow unscrupulous politicians to drive a country to war. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
2.2. Bài mẫu
Patriotism, according to some, is the chief cause leading to conflict and strife across the globe. This view, however, is contradicted by a belief that patriots are a net benefit to their own country, as the more interested they are in the country’s affairs, the more they are able to avert unconscionable wars. In taking both perspectives into account, I find myself strongly leaning toward the latter outlook.
It is not without proof that patriotism is the major element to war; evidence for this claim, in fact, is abundant, thanks to the pervasiveness of war propaganda which appeals to patriotism. Napoleon, in his quest to put Europe under French dominion, propagandized himself as a populistic figure who was performing patriotic duty to France by delivering peace and stability to the country. His nephew, Napoleon III, later started an ill – fated war against Prussia after promising the patriotic population that victory would restore France’s glory. Through these historical precedents, it is understandable that national devotion could be blamed for warfare.
Nevertheless, patriotism should not be perceived as a precursor to war, for I argue that passion for one own’s country might even have the opposite effect regarding conflict. When motivated by patriotism, people would want to improve their country’s standing and its spirit, but to fundamentally affect the issues that matter to their homeland, one would have to be involved in the country’s day – to – day workings. Consequently, the logical conclusion expected from patriotic people is that as peace facilitates carrying out their objectives, they would need to develop a cautious attitude toward warfare.
This vigilance, in turn, will be of help in resisting reckless calls to war from irresponsible politicians. Many of the most hawkish calls to war are hardly motivated by loyalty; instead, they come from special interest groups who would stand to profit the most from conflict, financially or politically. These groups are capable of claiming any cause to advocate for hostilities, and patriotism just so happens to be the easiest sense to invoke in the common folk. The only way to render these warmongers powerless, is to have people who have honest intentions for the country involved in the process of governance, where they would be able to keep jingoistic voices in check.
In conclusion, patriotism is not a force for war, but rather, one which can be harnessed against unscrupulous hostile action. It is my belief, therefore, that the patriotic’s interest in their own country’s agendas be encouraged and supported.
3. Bài mẫu IELTS Writing Task 2 Agree or Disagree – Bài số 3
3.1. Đề bài
Internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
3.2. Bài mẫu
In this day and age, the Internet has pushed back the frontier of human impossibilities in a multitude of spheres including traveling. This deep infiltration into the tourism industry makes some people declare that the Internet has turned traveling abroad into an obsolete choice. Nevertheless, from my standpoint, traveling in person still retains its values in the technology-driven era.
Admittedly, the Internet tremendously facilitates the demand for overseas traveling of time-poor or not-so-wealthy people. Modern people are usually characterized as work obsessives so their hectic working schedule will certainly be a huge hurdle to their traveling desire. Also, some people may find it difficult to afford an enjoyable overseas journey due to their lack of financial resources. In these cases, the Internet emerges as an ideal tool to help these people quench their thirst for going on vacation and having horizon-broadening experiences about foreign cultures. For instance, people can search on Youtube for a wide range of documentaries about indigenous cultures in remote areas like the Amazon forest, African jungles from international broadcasting channels such as Discovery or National Geographic.
However, I still attach myself to the position that the Internet cannot replace physical traveling. This is because only by traveling directly to another country can people acquire first – hand experience and appreciate foreign cultures to the full. Due to the lack of physical interaction, no matter how the virtual traveling experience from the Internet progresses, it pales in comparison with the first – hand experience when going to a foreign country. What is also worth contemplating is the quality guarantee of online information. Internet information about tourism may be presented in a distorted or biased way for entertainment purposes, which cannot paint a complete picture of the foreign lifestyle. Therefore, when going to other countries in person, travelers are able to see exotic cultures through their own spectacles and have more proactive acquisition of knowledge about different ways of life around the world. To exemplify, South Korea is often depicted in social media as a wealthy and highly civilized country. However, traveling directly there allows visitors to acknowledge certain dark spots in its society namely domestic violence and gender disparity, which is a fuller and more objective picture of this Asian nation.
In conclusion, even though the Internet can serve as a great traveling assistant for some people, traveling to other countries in person is still an unparalleled option in terms of the experience it offers. Hence, travel enthusiasts can flexibly choose either form of traveling but if given the chance, should go abroad directly to make the most out of traveling.
Trên đây là những bài mẫu IELTS Writing Task 2 Agree or Disagree chất lượng mà PREP đã tổng hợp cho bạn tham khảo. Nếu có điều gì thắc mắc thì đừng ngại để lại ở dưới bài viết nhé! Chúc bạn ôn luyện thật tốt và đạt kết quả cao!